RUS | ENG
latest news articles archive industry links Advertising
pharmstech articles

8.2006 ] [ 10.2006 ] [ 11.2006 ] [ 12.2006 ] [ 1.2007 ] [ 2.2007 ] [ 3.2007 ] [ 6.2007 ] [ 7.2007 ] [ 12.2007 ] [ 1.2008 ] [ 5.2008 ] [ 7.2008 ] [ 11.2008 ] [ 2.2009 ]

Audit Program Effectiveness Evaluation
PharmSystem Technologies

Keywords: audit program, audit service performance, value-added contributions.

 

An audit program must evaluate its effectiveness in the company to remain accountable for continuous improvement and general program objectives. While this may be routine for a sales or marketing department, it may be a more modern concept for the audit program. There are three ways to monitor program effectiveness:

  1. Auditor performance.
  2. Audit service performance.
  3. Value-added contributions.

Auditor performance assesses the competency of individual auditors as well as the consistency between them. To apply the measurement, management should:

  • Observe auditor performance during an audit.
  • Review customer performance evaluations.
  • Review audit deliverables.
  • Employ an independent auditor to evaluate auditor techniques.
  • Appraise general auditor credentials.

Audit service performance determines how the audit program meets customer expectations. Audit program management should:

  • Monitor audit related loss of customer time and/or resources.
  • Monitor contract term fulfillment
  • Monitor quality of audit deliverables, including audit reports.
  • Collect performance evaluation form audit customers
  • Facilitate focus groups to gather direct customer feedback.
  • Employ an independent auditor to audit the audit program.
  • Monitor the number and severity of external audits performed in the audit organization.

Value-added contributions determine how the audit program improves the organization’s business performance. To apply the measurement, management should:

  1. Compare planned completion of corrective action to actual completion.
  2. Plot the corrective action from the initial performance level through the stated performance goal.
  3. Evaluate completed corrective action:
  • Determine the degree to which planned corrective action is effective the first time.
  • Identify the number of “recycled” corrective actions that didn’t address root causes the first time.
  • Identify the number of repeat problems due to the same cause.
  • Determine the benefit of corrective action.

 

 © Copyright 2006-2010 PharmSystem Technologies. All rights reserved.